Safe schools czar recommended reading?

They aren't even attempting to hide intentions anymore. Their tactics are blatant, aggressive, and visible to anyone. Even while I purposefully take time away from the 4th estate (media), I see this so often that it alarms me. In another attempt to show you a pattern, I have stated before that this is not a "Christian", "right wing" stance against these groups of people, but a more parental stance against this type of gross disregard for those who are different from them. Meaning, those who "CHOSE" to be straight are now the scoffers and dissenters.

Kevin Jennings, the safe school czar, and founder of GLSEN from 1990-2008 (gay, lesbian, and straight education network) recommends books that are far more explicit than the average run of the mill LGBT propaganda finding their way into our schools. (See: "The Dignity for all students?")

GLSEN says it "works to create a welcoming atmosphere for homosexual students in schools, and that effort includes recommending books for students of all ages." What about the awkward atmosphere that it creates with the majority of straight students across America? They didn't have a choice in the matter.

The blame is shifted in the article above by GLSEN saying it is the parents' responsibility to review these books. Do they not even notice the decline of parental authority in western civilization? Have any of these people been to a mall in America lately? Children today are a MTV generation that hold disdain and contempt for their parents if they do apply rules and values in the home, so they will automatically trust anyone but their parents, namely the educator, counsellor, or the politician. People will use anything to justify everything. The child thinks, "I mean, if these are allowed in schools, they are okay right?" You are influencing young minds who don't even yet understand the impact of their own decisions. They don't fully comprehend right and wrong yet. Who would influence children this way with these books?

"Parents should review these books for subject matter"!?! Hypocrites! What a irresponsible thing for GLSEN to say, as if to cast blame, when they are the ones selecting the "recommended" material! Essentially they are not to blame. And when they are to blame, they are just being "persecuted" by hate-mongering conservatives. This is the man that has "safe school" in his title! They decide on our childrens' approved reading material! These are books for children that they approve for education? Why would these be approved for children in the first place? These are on an "approved", "recommended reading list"! There is no innocent Penguin with Penguin implication here! (See Penguins and Perversion). The cards are down, and the chips have fallen. They have shown what they truly want all literature to be. "It's artful and expressive." This link of their list is truly explicit and graphic both in word and photo. There is no denying the intentions of the writers or those who support these pieces of literature!

Would any parent want their children subjected to subversive, lewd, pornographic material hours after they darken the doors steps of their schools? Not to mention the ages of the targeted audience with these books. In spite of the fact that the overwhelming majority of Americans do not want same-sex unions, it's of no consequence anymore. Whether it's the 3rd graders or the high schoolers, they should have the freedom to choose, without opposition, the opposite sex the same way that gays and lesbians now have their freedom to choose the same sex. The old trends are dying out. Straight kids are now faced with fitting in with their peers or being a bigoted, hateful, religious outcast.

I'm so tired of the true dangers that grow everyday for youth in America. Their life truly "is among the unclean" They have targets on their backs. Their choices are already being made for them in several schools. The influx of homosexual acceptance is more rampant than ever before and only evolving more and more each year. As stated before on this blog, it is no longer the case of homosexuals having rights and being able to freely practice their chosen "lifestyle". They have had this for years now. They may not have the legal right to marry, but no one is being persecuted in the streets. These excuses are not viable reasons to flood our school systems with extremely graphic LGBT material in an attempt to bring "balance". No lesbian or gay student is being forcibly fed "Christian" rhetoric or ideologies. There is no "epidemic" of hate crimes against gays and lesbians. I read one article where the author said, "Gays and lesbians in America are victimized in hate crimes twice as often as blacks, and numerous studies show these attacks are much more brutal than most assaults." It is simply not the case, and is actually the other way around. In 2007, when gays and lesbians did not have nearly as much support for their movement as they do now, the FBI released these findings. When broken down, what you find out is this:

1,521 victims (Sexual orientation hate crimes)

335 - intimidation

448 - pushing, or shoving - no physical injury

242 - aggravated assault

242 out of 855,856 aggravated assault cases (0.028275785%)

Where is the epidemic?

Many of these cases are nothing more then slurs and over sensitivity about "their rights". They complain about America and its intolerance, but fail to realize that they can flaunt their homosexuality practically as much as they want without fear of arrest, slander or persecution. This fact is clearly seen in today's headlines. They have never had it so good in human history. They don't have to hide, they are out of the closets and obviously in our schools.

They have removed the Bible from libraries and prayer from the school system. They aren't required to say the Pledge of Allegiance, they aren't required to read Sunday school stories. They aren't required to pray with fellow classmates. Actual crimes against homosexuals are on a major decline unless you live in predominate Muslim countries or believe the biased, unfounded information from their own fear-inducing websites. Not to mention the lack of facts and findings on these sites. Freedom in America is actually working very well for the homosexuals. In fact, when you look at the world spectrum of abuses and crimes carried out against any person of the LGBT persuasion, America is a small blip. Are they even aware of what some countries have done in the past and present to homosexuals? They should be grateful to a nation that is even considering giving them a piece of paper that says "marriage" on it. This same nation, not 200 years ago in no way shape or form accepted this rhetoric. The definitions have changed. The homosexual movement has made great advancement! This is all methodical in it's process; well thought out indoctrination to desensitize America to tear down the walls of distinction between men and women and to blur right and wrong.

Even when their cause is thriving, they will still find delusional oppression and the need to event bigotry where it doesn't exist. Disagreement or disapproval is not bigotry! I say give them their "rights", let them marry one another. Then, maybe they won't see a need to forcefully shove it in the faces of our children while being protected by their twisted definition of our "first amendment rights". But that won't make a difference will it? They will keep scratching, clawing, and pushing until anyone with values, or morals questions the "fruit of their works", then we are merely discarded as the dregs of society under their boot.

With fear of lawsuits and stiff fines, nearly every corporation in America, private and small businesses a like, say nothing anymore. We now live in a time where you WILL get terminated from a job if you speak out against any LGBT persons or peoples. The military doesn't care anymore. The colleges don't care anymore. Washington doesn't care anymore. And even some churches in America don't care anymore. If they did care, or if it did bother them for personal or religious reasons, they can't say anything. All the advancement, all of the battles they have won, the endless appeals of Prop 8, the repeated claims of persecution comparable to Nazi-Germany, the support from Hollywood and the Entertainment industries, and they still blatantly publish and promote their propaganda for all of America's children, and view such propaganda as non-optional.

They have fought against not having the right to choose their lifestyle, while now they are forcibly denying any right of others. They will appeal propositions until they have changed them in every state. We are now the freaks that don't accept them. We are now the fruits and the nuts. We are now the weird people who need to get with the program. "It's 2009", right? Isn't that what Adam Lambert said? One has to wonder what credentials impressed President Obama for him to put Kevin Jennings in the role of "savior" of our schools and our youth. Especially considering his previously reported oh history involving statutory rape allegations and drug abuse. What a fine pick for the future of American generations coming out of our schools. Drug Free and Safe School czar!?

In the words of Rodney King, "Can't we all just get along?" I would actually prefer that at this point! Instead of fear of prison or fines, "live how you want!" If my next door neighbor wants to teach THEIR own children about the homosexual, bi-sexual, transgendered ways, I guess that's ultimately their business... but it is not the schools! If I want to teach my child purity, values, morals, and righteousness, it's my right as well....not the schools! That has been clear since 1963. I'm not talking about conversation, questions, debate, or discussion among students and their peers, but curriculum and literature that is placed before their eyes!

Standing against the homosexual movement is now portrayed to be the same as how Nazi Germany stood against the Jew. No homosexual is being forced to enter an incinerator in America. Here in California, homosexuals are afforded practically every legal right except the title of "marriage". There is no widespread persecution. I for one don't much care if they want to live the way they live. Honestly! I disagree with it and do not condone it, but realize they have that right under our governments definition of our laws. I don't see a gay man in the grocery store and treat him with disdain or disrespect. I don't key their cars, or mock them openly. I have to carry on conversations with them like any other person. They are here! And the way the world is going, they are staying. These are simply the times in which we live. I will discuss "issues" with them and will answer truthfully and honestly while doing so as politely as possible. Debate is healthy, can encourage truth, and expose error.

What I do take offense at is how the double standard is now ignored. How the LGBT and all the other like-minded organizations are infringing on the "freedom of choice" of those who are different from them. That right is now threatened more and more with these movements and these high positions in government. Kevin Jennings, the "safe schools czar", who before his appointing to his current position under President Obama's administration, was the head honcho of the GLSEN for 18 years. Eighteen years is along time to come up with a recommended reading list, and boy, did he ever!

It just kills them that they don't have the right to marry. They jump to "equal rights" and our documents to justify their immorality. Our documents are not there to protect you from what you deem to be a right. They were brought to fruition for a law abiding people. Your rights are only within the law. Why would you give a law breaker rights? That's why law-breakers are in prison. They are a danger to society, and many of their "rights" are taken away. They think it should be legal to introduce this material to children. They should be locked up. If your child was at a bus stop, and some man came to him with this kind of literature, what would you do? This is their not-so-hidden intent. They want to define what marriage is, they define bigotry, they define our documents, they define our nation. We have the "right" to be married, because we are male and female. That's why marriage was instituted for goodness sakes. For a man and a woman. Why do they want something that was established in every civilized culture on Earth for a man and woman?

If it truly is a "rainbow revolution" that you are bringing, get your own titles. Leave "marriage" to us simple minded people because we are just living in the past and don't know any better. Let us keep our old societal customs and traditions that you mock, but want at the same time. If you want to have your unions, by all means, go ahead. You can even name them something snazzy! I wish you the best of luck. But don't push your manner of life down my throat, or anyone else, especially while claiming the "education card". Don't apply your way of thinking to what has been established for thousands of years because you feel you "deserve" it, or the definition of a word has changed. In 1806, the first definition of the word "marriage" simply stated, "the joining of a man and a woman". By 2009, this last year, all dictionaries now have secondary definitions to include gender neutral language and same sex unions. What will it be 10 years from now?

LGBT's Love, Honor, Cherish, and Reject

I had stated in a previous post that the opponents of Prop 8 were not going to wait for long this time to appeal. Our judicial system works in such a way that even if the people have spoken, which they decisively have (see image - red is for prop 8, grey is against prop 8), it can be done all over again. The question remained, would they wait until 2012, or begin sooner. That was answered today as the website"Love, Honor, Cherish" stated that they will be moving forward to repeal Prop 8. This site is the go-to website for all LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Transgendered) supporters. The petition is available for download, and the site also contains several articles and videos promoting and encouraging same sex marriage.

There is actually a section entitled, "Religion",where they spend time discounting and disproving anything God said derogatory or negatively about same sex unions, and even go so far as to say the "the new testament is more affirming of same sex love" by showing passages where the disciple "whom Jesus loved" (John) had his head on the chest of Jesus Christ. These are nothing more than attacks on morality, and Christians to promote and protect their lascivious lifestyles. Following the verses in the gospels that he lists, the writer, David Zelman actually states, "Jesus loves men, and is not afraid to be physical with them".

Prior to such unlearned statements from a unregenerate man trying to explain the doctrines of the bible, he listed many OT references, and merely explained them away due to failed traditions, and out-dated laws of men. He typically and expectedly goes to the story of David and Jonathan and their close friendship, with pro-gay comments, but then list verses about sodomites being removed out of the land by righteous kings with zero comments. Why not comment on some of the greatest men and kings in the Bible, who routinely removed the sodomites out of the land? A homosexual or sodomite attempting to teach the dispensations and doctrines of the bible is like a med student attempting to lecture interns on the intricacies of brain surgery. It's interesting to point out when he gets past the gospels, and into the books such as Romans, Jude, and Revelation, he has no explanation but only list the verses. He says nothing. He then hangs himself by stating:

"The bible is a book to be interpreted and understood in the context of the time it was written."

So he understands the difference between Levitical law, and the gospel of the grace of God right? No, he ignores any New testament condemnation of homosexuality, and further more, has no explanation for the existence of such passages. This is the game. Portray any opponent of gay-marriage as an uneducated, dumb, simpleton Christian stuck in the past. The video on the same page shows a man and woman coming to the justice of the peace to get married. They jokingly portray this couple being slapped with all these OT laws. Some examples aren't even biblically founded, but rather referenced the time when wicked men practiced the act of "Droit de seigneur" or "Jus primae noctis" which means the "lord's right" allowing the ruling lord of an estate or lands to take the virginity of the virgins, or have the right to the first night. Amazingly, they use this to indicate it is from the bible.

"Love honor and Cherish" is nothing more than another LGBT mask to hide the true agenda. It's purpose is to educate by way of deception, and to promote by way of discrediting. Make Christians look like bigoted idiots with out-dated laws and references to morality contained within the pages of the bible while ignoring context. Any verse of scripture that is against homosexuality is to be explained away and tossed.

"Any person of “faith” who uses the text to condemn, persecute, or dehumanize homosexuals and deny them their rights is randomly justifying a pre-existing prejudice."

In their eyes, we are not afforded the right to disagree. if we do, it is immediately tossed up as prejudice. We are de-humanizing them!

Do you realize what he just said? Any verse of scripture from a bible that condemns or, persecutes homosexuals is guilty of being prejudice. Another article has a sermon from a pastor of a Church in Pasadena California that goes so far as to say the sin of sodom was inhospitality. Inhospitality? Really? They don't even have to have their research documented or thoroughly prepared. This is a "pastor"! They know people read and accept instead of reading and searching a matter out. David Zelman actually said that the lesson we get from Sodom is that "men should not have sex with male angels" I'm not making this stuff up. Read it!

Genesis 13:13 But the men of SODOM were wicked and sinners before the Lord exceedingly" Genesis 19:5 "And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? Bring them out, that we may know them" (if there is any doubt what "know them "means look at Gen 4:1 "And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived") Two verses later, Lot pleads with them "I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly" Inhospitality, yeah, I guess I see that in there. Sigh...

I Kings 14:24 And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the inhospitalities of the nations which the Lord cast out before the children of Israel.

He explains away Leviticus because there are other abominations being committed that were listed in Leviticus as well as homosexuality. Ok? Does that change the fact that it's still considered an abomination in the Old and New testaments. Read the article! These people don't even understand their own statements. He explains away Leviticus because of the outdated "abominations" such as using incense improperly or eating pork, but neglects to tell you that many of these laws and commandments found in Leviticus are "ready to vanish away" due to the "new testament"(Hebrews 8: and 9:). Leviticus was written in 1440 BC by OT Jews to OT Jews. Leviticus dealt with the "Levitical Priesthood".

This man continues, and never deals with any verse in the NT. Why is that? Because they can't explain it away by merely referencing old Jewish customs found in Leviticus. They don't even understand simple Sunday School theology, how that we are no longer under the law but under grace. The LGBT has been documented several times in previous posts if you really desire to remove the mask, and see them for what they are. Keep in mind that I can't even post other websites dealing with the LGBT due to content found on such sites. Love, Honor, Cherish? As long as you don't disagree!

80 million for artistic expression

This is old news, but I noticed that I had forgotten about it. At the time of the article, nearly 50 members of Congress were fighting fervently against this stimulus grant. One hundred thousand has already gone to some "risque art houses". Details of these houses in short include "kinky art porno horror films, men, women, and one gorilla, and a weekly production entitled "Perverts Put Out" (the long running production that invites guest to "join your fellow pervs for some explicit, twisted fun.") We could barely afford my sons birthday party this year in this economy, and then to read an article about the NEA receiving federal money (link PG-13) to allow furtherance of "artistic views" no matter how twisted, can be very frustrating. I can't even believe this stuff anymore, but at the same time, should I really be surprised given current events of the last 15 years? How is giving these 3 groups millions of dollars fiscally responsible? Do you know what we do in our house if we don't have the money? Nothing. What a slap in the face to Americans, 15 million now without work, just getting by, losing their homes, automobiles, etc, and we give 80 million dollars for "art". Maybe there is just something us ("dumb Americans" Bill Maher's thoughts) can't fathom about all this.

Considering the trillions of dollars of debt this nation is in, to even discuss the topic of irresponsibly giving millions of dollars out in the name of "freedom of expression" is bordering on insanity. That phrase never shows up in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, or the Declaration of Independence. It has been tacked or invented to make allowance for the nations' degenerates. Washington elites, instead of reading it, have become accustomed to "interpreting" the Constitution and other documents to fit their own preferences, and many Americans have followed suit.

Freedom of expression? Certainly those 3 words could cover anything and everything imaginable and conceivable in a mind, and in a body (given the context). So anyone who wants to exercise their "right" can delve into the dark recesses of immorality, blasphemous and detestable displays of religious figures, carnality, self indulgence, and pornographic material or art. These citizens not only act out their abominable desires, but can also receive funding for it, and protection from the same document that grant us freedom to worship as one nation under God. I'm not gonna beat a herd of dead horses but a man photographing or filming explicit images of underage girls is not covered under "freedom of expression". Nor does a "shock-jock" on Sirius Radio talking about every kind of deviant sexual act in great detail fall under the protection of the Bill of Rights because of it's abhorrent and carnal nature. The founding fathers would have never even considered such a notion due to the explicitness of the subject matter. And the man or woman guilty of commiting such contemptible speech would have been flogged, tarred and feathered, and most likely cut off from society and run out of town.

I love paying taxes...

"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical" - Thomas Jefferson

It's all about control

The government for some time now, both parties, are more frequently clamping down control on parents' rights when it comes to their children. From the homosexual propaganda, and the humanistic "hope in Obama" cheers that are becoming more common in American class rooms, it's no wonder this generation has a massive up-hill battle to climb.

The Michigan Department of Human Services, backed up by the state, are making a point to let parents know they can no longer babysit. What business does the state have saying a children can't wait at a different mothers' house for a school bus? This woman spoken of in the article was watching 3 other children for neighborhood moms for under an hour before they left for school. This woman has lived in this neighborhood for 35 years. Keep in mind that we are talking about Michigan too, the worst state in America as far as the economy. We don't send our kids to daycare for obvious reasons, but also for the monetary reasons. Day cares can run anywhere from $3,000 to $15,000 a month.

Furthermore, the fact that this complaint came from a neighbor is concerning. You know the type. They sit at home all day until the sun warms their feet; they peer out of their caves like vampires finding fault in everyone else; they act appalled that someone wouldn't put their kids in the trusted daycare system; they consider it their civil duty to stick their nose where it doesn't belong.

What happen to helping out fellow man? Why are Americans being restricted when it comes to simple "neighborhood" issues? It all comes back to control. In case you haven't noticed, the government sure seems content on not wanting you to educate, teach, or discipline your own children, so why should someone else's children be any different?

There are 3 children that are not in day care, and that is the root issue. As mentioned in the article this woman is enabling her neighbors to both work, just to get by. Now, her neighbors have to seek alternative means for their children's welfare for a short time only, on school days only.

I'm not saying that all day cares are wicked institutions for evil doers to indoctrinate children, but I'm also not naive enough to think it isn't happening. Anyone with any sense of current events in this country knows this to be true, whether it is daycare, kindergarten, grade school to high schools. The children are being educated out of any belief in God, and the basic core values that tell us right from wrong. Trust in man (as portrayed in the grade school "Change" video and the Hollywood pledge) which included these words "I pledge to be of service to Barrack Obama". On September 8th, the current administration sent out lesson plans to the all schools in America; teacher were to follow the plan and discuss Barrack Obama, and introduce him by way of books and other material. Grade school people! It's as if the children don't have a choice. They are bombarded with agendas and propaganda as soon as they hit the school system.

If the state or the federal government has more control, the more agenda-related filth they can filter into the school system. It is all tied in, and it is definitely a coordinated effort to push the equality issue when it comes to gay children and students. In the news nearly everyday in California, along with several other states, is the gay-rights issue (total protection) and the public school system. It has become frightening to live in California right now because there are laws (SB 777) on the books that dictate when and what children will be introduced to as far as alternative sexuality, in some cases as low as kindergarten. In this bill, it totally redefines what gender and sex are. This is a active law. And in the same bill, if you discriminate in any way, the book will be thrown at you.

This is happening before our eyes in America, and it is occurring all over the nation. From the control, to the indoctrination of our youth, to the propaganda. As I have said before, if they want to live in that state of perversion in America, they unfortunately have that freedom. If they want to live in this country, and take advantage of the freedom all Americans have, again, I'm ok with that. What you shouldn't have the freedom to do, along with anyone, is introduce that which is against nature to a young mind. They attack the basic fundamental foundations of this country, and aggressively go after laws and bills that introduce perversion to school children just because they think everyone should have the chance to be like them.

I don't know how much more clearer I can be about this one specific point about the homosexual movement, primarily the LGBT, and their constituents; they are aggressively, discretely, and effectively reaching our children, not adults, but OUR kids, with their "lifestyle". And the state telling an American mom she can't babysit 3 children for 30 minutes while they wait for a bus while the current administration is supporting and pushing policy that would have state licensed teachers, male and female, teach our grade school children the sensitive matters of the penguins and the bees. (see Penguins and Perversion)

The Dignity for "all" Students???

Back when I went to school, bullying was a big deal then too. I can remember several times getting bullied, or pushed around because of various reasons. Did I bring legal action against the school district, or did my parents go to the courthouse in my defense? On the contrary, it usually ended with me getting beat up by 2 or 4 jocks (I was a punk skater), me putting some toilet paper up my nose to stop the bleeding, and going back to class so my friends could laugh at me. Is there a problem with bullying today? Yes, and there always will be. Is that the real reason all these pro-gay acts and policies are being created? Absolutely not.

The Dignity for all Students Act is written for all children, is active in 11 states, and there are more states to come. It is used primarily to protect gay students in our school systems. This act is posted on several pro-gay websites as well. It is created exclusively for gay rights and this fact can be seen simply by reading it. "All private schools, including religious schools, are explicitly exempt from the law. The bill neither pressures private religious schools to promote homosexuality." Why would they feel the need to say that, if that isn't exactly what they are doing, promoting homosexuality?

This is a day and age where children are given the same prescription medication for their woes in grade school as an adult does. We are teaching our children to seek bail-out from the courts and resort to chemical dependency rather than face adversity. I am not for any child being picked on, bullied, or called derogatory names for any reason, and I believe ALL children should be protected. It is as fundamental as it gets. They are defenseless in most cases and they are our future. The link above takes you to a description of the act, and why it is believed that it is necessary. In the description, it states:

"to prohibit harassment against students in school, including harassment based on real or perceived race, color, weight, national origin, ethnic group, religion, religious practice, disability, sexual orientation, gender (including gender identity and expression) and sex, and to prohibit discrimination based on these same characteristics. The prohibition would apply to all public schools in the state."

That seems pretty fair across the board right? Immediately after this paragraph there is a section that says, "Why is it necessary." And this is where we see the true agenda:

"Schools are places where students should concentrate on learning and personal growth, not on avoiding taunting or violence. All students are negatively affected by bias harassment, but gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) students and those perceived to be LGBT in particular are the victims of severe and widespread discrimination and harassment in our public schools."

This is why they want this in schools, so the children who are jumping on the gay and bi-sexual bandwagon, or the transgendered trendy train, can have full protection to develop themselves into a gay and lesbian adult.

Since this bill has been active there have been numerous court cases involving gay students who felt they were being bullied or treated unfairly because some one called them names. There are instances where a student received $25,000 in August of this year. A Kansas youth in 2005 won $445,000 citing the same bill. Should we teach our children that if someone calls them a name, they can sue and get paid? Is that the message we are sending? I am not arguing whether their "rights" have been violated, I am arguing that they are not the real minority in public schools as they claim to be, and there is a very real double standard along these lines when dealing with students who claim to believe in Christ.

In 2009, you can't shut down or even bring into question ONE single gay and lesbian group, in any high school in America. If you do, the wrath of the ACLU and the LGBT will come down on that school district like an anvil.

In our American towns we have come so far. Now teachers are not even allowing kids to read a Bible in schools or have a book cover with the Ten Commandments on it, and teachers are calling the Bible "garbage".

Children can't even bring a Bible in for show and tell in Kindergarten, but a student can write and present a book report on Harvey Milk. What scary, dark, dreaded, hate-mongering, gay-bashing, fearful passage was going to be read? Just Psalms 118. The 3rd Circuit Court Judge Anthony Scirica who rejected the mothers claim for suit said this:

"parents of public school kindergarten students may reasonably expect their children will not become captive audiences to an adult's reading of religious texts...School officials have the RIGHT to require that parents refrain from promoting specific messages in class."

"Captive audiences"? "Specific messages"? What do you think the children in the Almeda school district have to do in kindergarten through 5th grade? They are held captive to hear a very specific message from LGBT propaganda every year, once a year, for 5 years, and no, they cannot opt out of it. These issues should not even be discussed among children. What business does anyone have, even a parent, discussing such strong sexually contrived dialogue with a 4-9 year old (Kindergarten - Fifth grade)? It's just not age-appropriate.

The school districts won't have Gideons leaving bibles, but they welcome discussion, support groups, and textbooks dealing with Transgender, Homosexual, and Lesbian matters. How is this double standard tolerated? I almost wouldn't be upset if Christians, and even Catholics were allowed to believe what they want without fear of ridicule, but that isn't the case. They are being silenced.

A Catholic girl was told to stop wearing her half inch crucifix necklace because it posed a health and safety risk in the same school where Muslims and similar religions can wear headscarves, sikh, bangles, and turbans.

A Christian student in a New York school district in Long Island, in the very same state that the "Dignity for all Students" act was introduced, was told her Bible study group was not recognized. The student then took action, the school settled the court cost, after the suit, she was awarded $1.

Who is the minority now?

Penguins and Perversion Pt. II

The Gay communities for years have protested that they "just want to live in peace and have their rights", or it's their own "private business", who cares what they do. "Leave us alone" they say. Gay rights activist just recently blanketed the Central Valley area, including the town where we live, huddled up on overpasses, and chanting their slogans. One activist was quoted to say, "we aren't here to impose our beliefs on anyone". So hundreds of these people drove 3 to 4 hours to "work the heartland" to appeal Prop 8. But goodness no, they aren't imposing their beliefs on anyone. They ARE imposing, and they are doing it nearly every week. Imagine if the table was flipped a bit, and a street preacher was standing on a corner holding up Genesis 13:13. Why you know they would say he is just trying to "shove religion down our throats".  These gay activist attempt to come off as easy going people. Make no mistake, they are on a mission for the Gay revolution. They want to destroy what marriage is. They want to change the laws. They want to stick it to the conservatives. They want to introduce perversion to grade school children. Anyone who has been on the front lines of morality over the last decade knows this to be the truth. 

They are more vigilant than most Christians when it comes to their cause. The pushing of the children's book "And Tango makes Three" about apparent penguin gayness has been so deliberate, it will most likely find its way into more schools systems. Once again, they find a way to misuse our nations documents with confusion on which one they are quoting, and much paraphrasing  to try to defend their unjust actions. In reference to this book, they bring up the separation of church and state as an excuse to get their warped views in the minds of the youth. 

Realistically, what do these people know of our nations documents? What does the Castro District in San Francisco know about the Bill of Rights other than article 3? What does NAMBLA and the LGBT know about the Declaration of Independence other then "all men are created equal,". I guess they missed the very next part after the comma which said, "that they are endowed by their Creator to have certain unalienable rights". Of course they wouldn't quote that. Or even the end of the Declaration of Independence for that matter, which states, 

And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

The ever-increasing "LGBT" (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) movement is wanting to be recognized more and more, and their partners in crime, the ACLU, protecting them from anything or anyone the "LGBT" deems a threat to have violated their "civil rights".

I can tolerate pretty much anything as far as social issues and events. I can tolerate living among certain classes of people. We live in a society that ensures that we tolerate. I can accept the fact that there are hundreds and thousands out there within 50 miles of me, that completely disagree with my way of thinking. I understand the concept of freedom. 

But what I and many other Americans find hard to except is the fact that a day after Prop. 8 was upheld for the second of many appeals to come, that the "LGBT" has slipped it's own curriculum into kindergarten schools.  Among the "penguins" children's book, they will also have lesson plans about alternate sexualities. This vile filth is being pushed on 5 year old children under the guise of teaching children about bullying and name calling. According to the article, the (wonderfully well trained and cared for American) children were using words like "fag", that they most likely heard from us unruly parents. So someone says, "Lets give the child a book about about immorality, depravity, degeneration, and them delve into the realm of the unnatural." They are attempting to recruit our children!

Instead of the school board teaching them how to speak properly, and steering them away from harsh, incorrect language that they  have had echoed in their ears, (ahem, parents) they say "Lets just educate them as to what a 'fag' really is, and what they do, and that it's acceptable behavior." Absolute lunacy.

Stated in this article as well, is that parents will not be able to opt their children out of this. Even if you're not a Christian, this should upset you. Apparently attorneys and school boards know what is best for your kids now. 

We are talking about 5 year child! These are not high school or college kids, and they should not be exposed to matters of any sexual partnerships whatsoever. They have only been alive for 1-2-3-4-5, count them, years! Why introduce them to such confusion and controversy? They should be getting dirty, playing with fire trucks, or beating up younger siblings. In this nations kindergartens or schools they should be learning the ENGLISH LANGUAGE, reading, writing, math and so on and so forth.

What is happening? The Supreme Court voted to remove biblical teachings from public schools in 1962, and since then, we have seen the reaping and impact of that decision. 

"The only foundation for a useful education in a republic is to be laid in religion. Without this there can be no virtue, and without virtue there can be no liberty, and liberty is the object and life of all republican governments."

 

(Benjamin Rush, Signer of the Declaration of Independence)

Penguins and Perversion Pt. I

I hate penguins...

I find them offensive, and loathsome.

Foul little beasts...

They are so adorable it makes me sick. The penguin also provides me with proof that evolution is false. When will they ever evolve to leave their harsh existence for warmer, less miserable, climates? And will they ever cease from the relentless onslaught of all the "observe penguin life" films (March of the Penguins, Happy Feet, etc)?

I heard about this article from a friend of mine, and I must say, it took me quite a bit of searching to find it. These things usually don't find their way on to the front page news. Now, we have this children's book "A Tango Makes Three" which is about two male penguins raising a female penguin scrat in a N.Y. zoo. How spectacular! 

We know for a certainty they did not birth it into existence. Well, who knows in this day and age, clones and all? Joking! But seriously, it isn't like 2 dude penguins saw each other one day, fell in love, found this little penguin chick, and lived happily ever after. They are in a ZOO! It is not the common course of events in nature. In some animal circles, the pack exhibits extreme prejudice against one with homosexual tendencies.  Another important fact they neglect to mention is that these so called tendencies many times are nothing more then consensual incest among prides, or packs, for procreation to the furtherance of continued survival in extreme, prey-deprived, harsh lands.

Gay rights scientist have suggested that the "crime against nature" argument is invalid because of about 450 individual creatures that they have found to have homosexual behavior. You have to think about these numbers though. These 450 individual creatures are picked out of millions of creatures which have been selected from 1,000 to 3,000 species. Most are from the insect, and bird groups, and having close ancestry within their own groups. So in their eyes, homosexual behavior among the fruit fly, justifies their acts.

What they don't tell you also is most of it is just animal "behavior". They don't tell you that they aren't tapping into the other 50,000 plus species that include trillions of living creatures that exhibit normal heterosexual behaviors. In the scale of things in the animal kingdom, the subjects found to have homosexual behavior are nothing more than a speck, or what some may classify as very rare.  It is a moot point anyway. 

Animals can't determine law, and penalty. They have no discernment of sin or righteousness. They are insects, birds, fish and a few obscure animals that they have singled out to attempt to scientifically back their way of life. Many of these cases were like the 3  penguins in the Bronx. They are placed in isolation with same-sex partners over long periods of time to be studied. So, there will most likely be a bond that develops over time between the test subjects. That is all these wicked men will need to have approval for their next grant to continue government funded research into animals and homosexual studies all while using our tax money.

One advocate of the "gay nature" argument stated:

"Homosexual behavior is not only common, but even more common in other species than in humans. While numbers are hard to come by, there are a few that present some interesting patterns."

These men and women that do this research are quite literally void of common sense. Of course this man's quote would be the case. I find it funny how in the actual research article, very little proof or footnotes are provided. Par for the course I suppose.

Do you realize how many species of fish life, insect life, bird life, and mammal life there are out there? We are STILL discovering new species and life on planet Earth for that matter. So we have quite literally trillions of innumerable, created beings on this planet compared to a few 6 billion humans on this planet. Then out of those "trillion" they pick 450? Don't be naive. Most of these people will lie, steal, cheat, and in a few cases, even kill to bring in their homosexual kingdom (agenda). This "animal" argument simply does not stand as a valid point of debate, as most of their contested statements.

Wow, that was quite the rabbit trail. 

Enough with the penguin nonsense...