Suffering, the Little Children!

It has taken a while for something to arrest my attention, and to compel to write down my thoughts on a matter. One can never expect headline like those we see in our age today. Jessica's Law should never be a guideline or a "maybe" to men, or women in position of political power, when it comes to seeking to keep children safe from predators. It should be exactly what it is in name, a law. "The Tyranny of Good Intentions" is a phrase I often use to describe instances such as this. Budget, funding, and any other underhanded, self realized revelations of men has the potential to release a flood of offenders on the communities in the "land of the free". It just so happens that this is the report from California, and unfortunately, it is not JUST sexual offenders, but (violent) sexual offenders, too often their pray are those that are weak and defenseless! This subject cannot be dealt with more incessantly.

As far as I can tell this is a early report, but apparently, some whistle blowers, finally blew their whistles at the Department of Mental Health when they allegedly went against policy and LAW, and subsequently led to the release of Seventeen Thousand sexual offenders back on the street. The Department of Mental Health decided to hand over 17,000 cases of violent sex crimes to one Psychiatrist. This one man reviewed all of these cases over the last few years and 17,000 of these offenders were released on the California streets. This is highly illegal and subverted. The Attorney General Compliant can be viewed here. This was done to cut spending. A Man raped and killed a 14 year old girl 4 days after being released from incarceration! It is already a disastrous turn of events. Imagine being the parents of that little girl.

If it doesn't make sense there is a buck in it! If you want to find out the truth, check the money trail! We have all heard these profound statements of searching and investigating truth. Who has the clout to battle big politics? It makes one dream of the old West where justice was swift and furious. Sure many men were killed in haste and injustice. Sometimes over a hand of cards. But horse thieves were shown no mercy. Men who defiled youth were shown no quarter. Even enemies agreed upon these matters. Often they wouldn't even make it to the gallows, but were removed by other measures. Any civilized society in the world knows the ramifications of letting such offenders back into a populous. I don't think I can be harsh enough. The very prison population these men inhabited in many cases detested these sort. There will come a day when true justice and vengeance upon the worst sort will be exacted. As well as onto those who aligned themselves with these offenders. Judges, Lawyers, Shrinks, Officials. Nothing will be hidden! They have their reward!

What deals and corner cutting are so expedient to have no concern for repeat offenders premeditated actions? What possible economic struggles do we face today as Americans that would lead anyone to justify letting out the worst of the worse? Why are murderers set free to kill again? Why are rapist set free to rape again? Why are corrupt men allowed to violate purity, youth and innocence, again? Why are crooked politicians and elected officials allowed leniency, and allowed to maintain their positions? Do these men have children of their own. While theirs may be sleeping safe in sound in their houses and lands, ours or put at risk by the public threats. Parents must be vigilant and watching in these times.

One can only shudder at the thought of what goes on behind closed doors. All the hand shakes. All the "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours" talks. Democrat, Republican, Independents, Libertarian, Constitutionalist, it makes no difference. You work in that system, you will give up something. What are we doing in the political world that is so important, so vital, that we have to cut funds by releasing evil into the world again to rage. Men in politics will do anything to advance their careers. They will change anything to get votes. They will flip sides to win support. These are who we trust for our better judgment on national matters. Those who use our money to travel around the globe to see their mistress. Those who cut cost by releasing lions.

Political life used to be different. It used to be elected officials were elected by the people, for the people. They would travel to Washington, D.C. 2 weeks out of the months. They held much more insignificant roles as the politicians of today. They held less power, and less authority. It was a small government, now it is big government. The held jobs away from politics. They assembled because they wanted to better their society in which they lived, not their selfish careers and wealth.

A friend wondered why there had not been a revolution with all the hikes in tax rates and interest rates. No one can fight the government. or the army that she owns. Men of detestable character, whom at some point in their life had to compromise to even be in such a government. It's would be extremely difficult for a man of biblical faith and character to be wrapped up in such trivial affairs of this life and accomplish anything. The machine usually is not the one who yields. Men give and inch of compromise in politics and the impact is broad.

Budget control! This is why men of this sort were released? In an age where men can go to therapy for sex (The National Board of Psychiatry rejects sex as an addiction, but a proposed new addition), it seems like everyone is irresponsibly looking for pleasure in sin for a season, no matter their position. It's in every facet of life. If men are allowed to follow their black hearted lust, and our system protects and coddles them, and convinces them they have a disease and need therapy, what do we have left to do as parents?

Degenerates let loss to prey and devour. Are all hunting and stalking? Who knows? I doubt anyone is even watching them. But one death is all it should take to overturn such irresponsibility to the people of the state of California and other states who may be directly affected. Tyranny of Good Intentions!

Convenient Lies!

With men such as Al Gore using "ballpark" figures to give the world his interpretation of "climate change", it's becoming more and more obvious that you have to have a lot of faith to believe in the evolutionary religion. At the UN Climate Summit in Copenhagen, Al Gore stated:

"These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr. [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 percent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-free within five to seven years."

Gore basis this statement on what? Records, statistics, information gathering, analysis, tests, etc? No. These bold claims came from a "conversation from several years ago" with Dr. Maslowski. In fact, Dr. Maslowski said, "It's unclear to me how this figure was arrived at. I would never try to estimate likelihood of anything as exact as this".

More and more of these reports keep coming up about the inconsistencies in their stories with climate change (Climate Gate). Climates themselves around the world are contradicting their theories. Ten years ago, we were going to burn up. The heat waves were so intense. "Global Warming" was the culprit. Man was systematically, through pollution, and gases, destroying the earth that Mother Nature had given us. Now, it can't be Global Cooling due to the contradiction in terms, so "Climate Change" is the new funny phrase.

There are so many of these examples out there of evolutionist, and scientist, and even supporting politicians using their reputation instead of their own trusted laws of science to prove a theory. All of their figures are hypothetic, summations or approximates. They all have the same terminology in all of their findings. The Christian is the fundamental nutcase? The Christian who believes in creation is the religious fanatic? Creation is viewed as "unbelievable".

They have "discovered" this year, that the universe is 1.5 billion years older then "we" thought. Hubble was given an update, which allowed them to see further into the galaxy. They call these galaxies, "the earliest known galaxies". "These galaxies started forming 500 million years after the big bang." Really? Any figures, findings, evidence, provided? Anything? They just say, and we believe. What faith! They say in the article, "We are looking back through 95% of the universe now".

How can America listen to these people of great faith, who keep changing the dates of the big bang back and forth to fit their findings. That's what is happening. That's why they have to change names, terminology, thesis, hypothesis, and theories. They keep running into things they can't fit into their charts, and graphs. They have to keep redoing them, or coming out with 4th and 5th edition textbooks on Astronomy, Evolution, etc. There is still 90% of the ocean that has been uncharted, and we think we have the Universe figured out.

You will not figure out the mysteries of the heavens. No matter how much we invest into the space program. That’s the problem with the real Athiest/Evolutionist. They don’t discount God completely, they doubt. After they doubt, they must come up with a logical reason why they doubt. So, they just treat him as a scientific experiment that needs to be proven. Therefore by scientific analysis, if they can’t prove his physical existence, then the theory of evolution, Darwinism, and the Big Bang, are sling-shotted to the prominent belief in their mind.

What hypocrisy! They hold God to this box of examination and critique, but not the Universe? They can't prove the age of the Universe, anymore than they can prove the existence of God. These things are beyond their human comprehension. So they just pull numbers from anywhere, between 500 million to 700 million years. What if a Christian answered someone from the bible in that way? "Well, I don't know about creation, just read somewhere between Genesis and Revelation and your bound to find an approximate." "It's in there somewhere." The world expects more from us. We give chapter and verse as best we can with our feeble, limited understanding of the scriptures. We don't have the luxury to say, "Oh, somewhere in the area of". We would be discredited! We are expected to answer all of mans questions. If we don't, then man doesn't want what we have. But someone tells you that the universe is 500 million years old and we accept this collectively. Why? Their own minds and studies contradict each other. Their own methods of dating are done differently. When I say their minds, most prominent scientist, intellectuals, philosophers, educators, liberal minds etc.

Prominent Professor, educator Athiest Richard Dawkins explains:

"The temptation [to attribute the appearance of a design to actual design itself] is a false one, because the designer hypothesis immediately raises the larger problem of who designed the designer. The whole problem we started out with was the problem of explaining statistical improbability. It is obviously no solution to postulate something even more improbable."[19]

As such he argues that the theory of a universe without a God is preferable to the theory of a universe with a God.[20

Thats what men do. If they can’t explain God, they remove him. If they can’t scientifically, through process of analysis and examination confirm that God exist, they reject him. They ignore archeological evidence and historical evidence, and repel it with outrageous claims of man made fables such as the “Big Bang” theory and Darwinism.

Even when they give the evidence of their methods of dating, or estimating the age of fossils, rocks, sediment, universe, mass, etc, they use words and phrases like “Scientist assume”, “more or less”, “we can estimate”, this technique of dating assumes the...”, “the agreement of these figures give the scientist a degree of confidence”, “assuming the rate of collection of (moon or space) dust is not a fundamental property of the universe”, or just "ballpark" it, like the politician (not scientist) Al Gore does.

Stephen Hawking, renown theoretical physicist, literal agnostic and scientist, recently claimed his 30 year long theory on Black Holes was incorrect. The very theory that was used to help man to better understand the universe, is now wrong. Thirty years of relative theories from thousands of scientist, using Hawkings "blackhole theories" as a launch pad for other theories, equals mass confusion and contradictions.

They admit this! Research was done with his findings in the "found equations". What does this classify their theories as now? Obsolete! The scientific community was shocked at his admission of error. Science is supposed to prove a theory by analysis and evidence. If some were basing their "own theories" on Hawking, they must start over as well. This theory was his major contribution to cosmology and quantum gravity. He provided mathematical proof for his findings which he now says are inaccurate. “I want to understand the universe...that’s what keeps me going” he said. Hawking has referenced God in a Agnostic way many times in his writings and lectures. When he runs up against things he can’t grasp, he conveniently uses a God to get out of it.

Stephen Hawking said, “The whole history of science has been the gradual realization that events do not happen in an arbitrary manner, but that they reflect a certain underlying order, which may or may not be divinely inspired.”

"I believe the universe is governed by the laws of science, the laws may have been decreed by God, but God does not intervene to break the laws."

He jokingly states that God “gambles” and “throws dice” as if God can’t control his creation when trying to explain thousands of unexplained, supernatural phenomena's that occur in space. They are mysteries. And man, no matter how many telescopes we build, nor how many shuttles and satellites we send into outer space, will never know some of the mysteries in the universe. Their love of knowledge has driven a wedge of pride between them and their very creator. They desire to understand mysteries in the universe that are reserved for the one who made it.

Talk about blind faith. Faith in men, or faith in God. These men consider themselves to be the very pinnacle of evolution. They have the minds and the intellect that can explain all things to the world. They can land on the Moon, hence they have arrived. They have conquered space. This is the method of operation in the mind of man. They don't see the vast universe he created, they see the moon that THEY landed on. They assume they can see 95% of the known galaxy while admitting they can't see the end of it. How do they get the 95% then? How do they know there is only 5% they can't see, if they can't see the end of it? It's nothing more than "great swelling words of vanity". Men who chose not to believe in God now must affirm their disbelief with belief in something else. They disallow creation (Life created by God) as a fairy tale, and they accept a much larger fairy tale of their own (life created out of nothing). Their faith is the big bang, their doctrine is the origin of species, and their hope is in all flesh.